Old Hollywood
Cinema
1900-1979

Nostalgia is a seductive liar - George Wildman Ball
Anouk Aimée in 8½ (1963, dir. Federico Fellini) 
(via)

Anouk Aimée in  (1963, dir. Federico Fellini) 

(via)

Barbara Stanwyck & Henry Fonda in The Lady Eve (1941, Preston Sturges) (via reelclassics) (online here)
“You don’t know very much about girls. The best ones aren’t as good as you think they are and the bad ones aren’t as bad. Not nearly as bad.”

Barbara Stanwyck & Henry Fonda in The Lady Eve (1941, Preston Sturges) (via reelclassics) (online here)

“You don’t know very much about girls. The best ones aren’t as good as you think they are and the bad ones aren’t as bad. Not nearly as bad.”

Barbara Bates in final scene of All About Eve (1950, dir. Joseph L. Mankiewicz)
“Tell me, Phoebe, do you want someday to have an award like that of your own?”
“More than anything else in the world.”
“Then you must ask Miss Harrington how to get one. Miss Harrington knows all about it.”

Barbara Bates in final scene of All About Eve (1950, dir. Joseph L. Mankiewicz)

“Tell me, Phoebe, do you want someday to have an award like that of your own?”

More than anything else in the world.”

Then you must ask Miss Harrington how to get one. Miss Harrington knows all about it.”

Nora Gregor in The Rules of the Game (1939, dir. Jean Renoir)

Nora Gregor in The Rules of the Game (1939, dir. Jean Renoir)

Jeanne Moreau, Oskar Werner, Sabine Haudepin & Henri Serre in Jules & Jim (1962, dir. Francois Truffaut)

Jeanne Moreau, Oskar Werner, Sabine Haudepin & Henri Serre in Jules & Jim (1962, dir. Francois Truffaut)

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968, dir. Stanley Kubrick)
Interviewer: Why does 2001 seem so affirmative and religious  a film? 
Stanley Kubrick: The God concept is at the heart of this film. It’s unavoidable that it would be, once you believe that the universe is  seething with advanced forms of intelligent life. Just think about it for  a moment. There are a hundred billion stars in the galaxy and a hundred  billion galaxies in the visible universe. Each star is a sun, like our  own, probably with planets around them. The evolution of life, it is  widely believed, comes as an inevitable consequence of a certain amount of  time on a planet in a stable orbit which is not too hot or too cold. First  comes chemical evolution — chance rearrangements of basic matter, then  biological evolution.
Think of the kind of life that may have evolved on those planets over the millennia, and think, too, what relatively giant technological strides  man has made on earth in the six thousand years of his recorded  civilization — a period that is less than a single grain of sand in the  cosmic hourglass. At a time when man’s distant evolutionary ancestors were  just crawling out of the primordial ooze, there must have been  civilizations in the universe sending out their starships to explore the  farthest reaches of the cosmos and conquering all the secrets of nature.  Such cosmic intelligences, growing in knowledge over the aeons, would be as  far removed from man as we are from the ants. They could be in  instantaneous telepathic communication throughout the universe; they might  have achieved total mastery over matter so that they can telekinetically  transport themselves instantly across billions of light years of space; in  their ultimate form they might shed the corporeal shell entirely and exist  as a disembodied immortal consciousness throughout the universe.
Once you begin discussing such possibilities, you realize that the religious implications are inevitable, because all the essential attributes  of such extraterrestrial intelligences are the attributes we give to God.  What we’re really dealing with here is, in fact, a scientific definition of  God. And if these beings of pure intelligence ever did intervene in the  affairs of man, so far removed would their powers be from our own  understanding. How would a sentient ant view the foot that crushes his  anthill — as the action of another being on a higher evolutionary scale  than itself? Or as the divinely terrible intercession of God?
-excerpted from The Film Director as Superstar by Joseph Gelmis

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968, dir. Stanley Kubrick)

Interviewer: Why does 2001 seem so affirmative and religious a film?

Stanley Kubrick: The God concept is at the heart of this film. It’s unavoidable that it would be, once you believe that the universe is seething with advanced forms of intelligent life. Just think about it for a moment. There are a hundred billion stars in the galaxy and a hundred billion galaxies in the visible universe. Each star is a sun, like our own, probably with planets around them. The evolution of life, it is widely believed, comes as an inevitable consequence of a certain amount of time on a planet in a stable orbit which is not too hot or too cold. First comes chemical evolution — chance rearrangements of basic matter, then biological evolution.

Think of the kind of life that may have evolved on those planets over the millennia, and think, too, what relatively giant technological strides man has made on earth in the six thousand years of his recorded civilization — a period that is less than a single grain of sand in the cosmic hourglass. At a time when man’s distant evolutionary ancestors were just crawling out of the primordial ooze, there must have been civilizations in the universe sending out their starships to explore the farthest reaches of the cosmos and conquering all the secrets of nature. Such cosmic intelligences, growing in knowledge over the aeons, would be as far removed from man as we are from the ants. They could be in instantaneous telepathic communication throughout the universe; they might have achieved total mastery over matter so that they can telekinetically transport themselves instantly across billions of light years of space; in their ultimate form they might shed the corporeal shell entirely and exist as a disembodied immortal consciousness throughout the universe.

Once you begin discussing such possibilities, you realize that the religious implications are inevitable, because all the essential attributes of such extraterrestrial intelligences are the attributes we give to God. What we’re really dealing with here is, in fact, a scientific definition of God. And if these beings of pure intelligence ever did intervene in the affairs of man, so far removed would their powers be from our own understanding. How would a sentient ant view the foot that crushes his anthill — as the action of another being on a higher evolutionary scale than itself? Or as the divinely terrible intercession of God?

-excerpted from The Film Director as Superstar by Joseph Gelmis

Eddra Gale & Barbara Steele in 8 1/2 (1963, dir. Federico Fellini)

Eddra Gale & Barbara Steele in 8 1/2 (1963, dir. Federico Fellini)

This Good Friday public service announcement has been brought to you by Amarcord (1973, Federico Fellini)

This Good Friday public service announcement has been brought to you by Amarcord (1973, Federico Fellini)

Malcolm McDowell & Ludwig van in A Clockwork Orange (1971, dir. Stanley Kubrick)
Q. Alex loves rape and Beethoven: what do you think that implies? 
Stanley Kubrick: I think this suggests the failure of culture to have any morally refining  effect on society. Hitler loved good music and many top Nazis were  cultured and sophisticated men but it didn’t do them, or anyone else, much  good.
via Kubrick: The Definitive Edition by Michel Ciment, Gilbert Adair, & Robert Bononno

Malcolm McDowell & Ludwig van in A Clockwork Orange (1971, dir. Stanley Kubrick)

Q. Alex loves rape and Beethoven: what do you think that implies?

Stanley Kubrick: I think this suggests the failure of culture to have any morally refining effect on society. Hitler loved good music and many top Nazis were cultured and sophisticated men but it didn’t do them, or anyone else, much good.

via Kubrick: The Definitive Edition by Michel Ciment, Gilbert Adair, & Robert Bononno

Anthony Perkins in The Trial (1962, dir. Orson Welles)

Anthony Perkins in The Trial (1962, dir. Orson Welles)

Jeanne Moreau in Jules & Jim (1962, dir.  Francois Truffaut)
“I never laughed before I met you two. I always looked like this. But that’s over for good. Now it’s like this.”

Jeanne Moreau in Jules & Jim (1962, dir. Francois Truffaut)

“I never laughed before I met you two. I always looked like this. But that’s over for good. Now it’s like this.”

This is your brain on tannis root & Satanism: Mia Farrow in Rosemary’s Baby (1968, dir. Roman Polanski)

This is your brain on tannis root & Satanism: Mia Farrow in Rosemary’s Baby (1968, dir. Roman Polanski)

Malcolm McDowell in A Clockwork Orange (1971, dir.Stanley Kubrick)
 
“Man isn’t a noble savage, he’s an ignoble savage. He is irrational, brutal, weak, silly, unable to be objective about anything where his own interests are involved—that about sums it up. I’m interested in the brutal and violent nature of man because it’s a true picture of him. And any attempt to create social institutions on a false view of the nature of man is probably doomed to failure.”
-Stanley Kubrick, 1972

Malcolm McDowell in A Clockwork Orange (1971, dir.Stanley Kubrick)

“Man isn’t a noble savage, he’s an ignoble savage. He is irrational, brutal, weak, silly, unable to be objective about anything where his own interests are involved—that about sums it up. I’m interested in the brutal and violent nature of man because it’s a true picture of him. And any attempt to create social institutions on a false view of the nature of man is probably doomed to failure.”

-Stanley Kubrick, 1972

Jean-Paul Belmondo in Breathless (1960, dir.  Jean-Luc Godard)
“When I accepted the role, [Godard] gave me the script. Three little pages on which he’d written:
He leaves Marseilles.
He steals a car.
He wants to sleep with the girl again. She doesn’t.
In the end, he either lives or dies - to be decided. 
That was it. So every morning, I learned about Poiccard’s further adventures. I had no idea what would happen to me that day. I found out each morning.” 

Jean-Paul Belmondo in Breathless (1960, dir. Jean-Luc Godard)

“When I accepted the role, [Godard] gave me the script. Three little pages on which he’d written:

He leaves Marseilles.

He steals a car.

He wants to sleep with the girl again. She doesn’t.

In the end, he either lives or dies - to be decided. 

That was it. So every morning, I learned about Poiccard’s further adventures. I had no idea what would happen to me that day. I found out each morning.”